I am a baby boomer. My grandfather was born in 1880
at a time when there were no cars, no planes, no computers…hell, the telephone
was just invented. How much leadership
expertise do you think he had? And how
different was he from the majority of the population?
Seventy years later my father entered the
workforce. He had just spent the prior
20 years surviving the depression and World War II. He was a rarity in that he had a university
education. The total student body of his
university was captured in one panoramic photograph. How much leadership expertise do you suspect
he brought to his early roles; where could he go for wisdom? Like his peers, he
adopted the only style he knew…survival of the fittest and commander in chief,
tainted by PTSD.
It was the best that they could offer. For boomers entering the workforce in the 70’s
and 80’s, these were their mentors. Is it
any wonder that so many of the greatest demographic generation failed to live
up to the expectations?
Their leadership style was modified to embrace a
motto of entitlement. He who has the most
toys wins. Wall Street insisted that ‘greed
is good’. The Vice Chairman at Goldman
Sachs was quoted as saying ‘…we have to accept that inequality is a way of
achieving greater opportunity and prosperity for all…’ The message was different but the underlying
style remained the same.
We are now firmly in the grasp of the 21st
century. This historic style does not work and will not serve us in the coming
decades. But decisions still must be made and leadership must be
exhibited. In my experience, consensus
decision making is simply a recipe for inaction. But the authoritarian method is a recipe for
abuse. What’s the answer?
First, some realities.
1. Individuals
are much better educated and experienced and therefore much better prepared to
lead.
2. Most
employees are also much better educated and capable of making informed
contributions.
3. There
are fewer levels of management thereby allowing for closer communication top to
bottom.
4. Diversity
has created a deeper pool of candidates with the skills needed to lead
successfully.
5. The
complexity of business means that no one has all the answers.
An effective leader is one who:
1. Is willing to be held to the highest levels of
moral, ethical and legal conduct.
2. Understands
that leadership is a privilege and not a right.
3. Seeks
input from various sources, internal and external, in developing decisions.
4. Acknowledges
the contributions of others and reinforces that success comes from the team,
not the individual.
5. Accepts
not only the responsibility and authority of the position but also the accountability.
It’s a big ‘ask’. The challenges we face are more
daunting than ever and one size does not fit all. We are beyond the time of excuses and procrastination
until ineffective leaders are replaced by those who can deliver. We need more,
now!
No comments:
Post a Comment