As I reviewed the recent Vice President’s Debate, I
was struck by how much more accomplished, or at least palatable, these two
candidates were when compared to their Presidential running mates. Americans, and frankly most of the rest of
the world, wish that there were better choices for President. The debate provided some small comfort in
knowing that the person in the second fiddle seat is probably better suited for
the office than either of the primary candidates.
What about in your case? How strong is your second fiddle? Have you the confidence of leadership to
actually groom someone who may be your equal?
Do you have the resolve to install a successor who could be even better
than you?
The fact of the matter is that this is a difficult
task but a necessary one. The most
effective leaders know and understand the consequences of poor succession
planning and therefore face this issue head on.
The less effective ones prefer to build a legacy at which all will wonder
in awe and only hope that the second seat will learn to grow into the position
when the torch is passed.
The irony is this.
Those who build an organization that is passed on to a poor successor
will not be remembered for what they built, but rather for the regression that
occurred afterwards. In contrast, the
leader who valued the company over their ego will be remembered as the
consummate builder because things continued to grow, despite their absence.
Regardless of the significance of the position of
leadership you hold within your organization, you are the maestro, you are the
conductor responsible for ensuring a smooth transition to the next…to your
successor. How well you do this speaks
not only of your competencies as leader, but even more importantly, of your character.
No comments:
Post a Comment