There are individuals in our world who must be avoided at all costs. These people are simply incapable of acting in a trustworthy manner as they lack the character upon which a viable relationship can be based. In their eyes, appeasement is to compromise as allegiance is to loyalty. Allow me to expand.
Putin offers a perfect example. When he provoked Ukraine and the world by invading Crimea, he was not looking to find a peaceful resolution to his demands. There was no expectation of compromise over his actions; he wanted only appeasement. In his economy, there should be no response or consequences. That is essentially what transpired. Absent compromise, Putin felt the liberty to expand his ambitions and appeasement got us 2022!
That is a macro example of appeasement. But a more granular example is found in the actions of men like Harvey Weinstein, Frank Stronach, Peter Nygard, Jeffrey Epstein or Mohamed al-Fayed. All of these men have been accused of sexual predation in their respective work places. When they approached female employees, they were not looking for a compromise. They expected, nay demanded, appeasement of their desires. They anticipated that there would be no consequences to their actions. They were prepared to give up NOTHING... they certainly had no dignity to lose.
The same analogy applies to allegiance versus loyalty. The US Pledge of Allegiance states ‘...I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands...’ It is noteworthy that the pledge is not to any person or persons. The allegiance is a one directional commitment because a flag or a republic is incapable of a relationship with or commitment to something else. One offers their allegiance without an expectation in return. Loyalty, on the other hand, is a two-way commitment. One person commits themselves to the support of another on the basis of commitments made by the other. It is a relationship based on mutual goals and understandings and lasts as long as both parties hold to those values. Therein lies the fundamental difference between allegiance and loyalty; one directional commitment versus bi-directional.
At a macro level, I would submit that Donald Trump looks for allegiance, not loyalty. His view seems to be ‘...do as I say, not as I do...’ and he refuses to hold himself accountable for any failures or shortcomings in the relationships he maintains. At a more granular level, you may find yourself in situations in the work place or outside of that environment, in which others look to you for allegiance, a relationship devoid of consequences, versus loyalty, a relationship of mutual care and consideration. The former is unhealthy and cannot last. The latter is a relationship of equals.
Discard those situations that are defined by appeasement and allegiance. Seek out those characterized by compromise and loyalty. You will be safer and healthier to be absent the toxicity.
Believe me, you do not just remember. It is impossible to forget.
On November 11th, take a moment to say thank you to those whom you will never meet. They believed in the future and paid the price to protect it. Now it is our turn to acknowledge them...